No Statute of Limitations on Atrocities: Prof. Leila Nadya Sadat Frames Iran Massacres as Crimes Against Humanity

Professor Leila Nadya Sadat, former Special Adviser on Crimes Against Humanity to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), asserted that Iran's 1988 massacres fall squarely within the legal definition of crimes against humanity: widespread and systematic attacks directed against a civilian population pursuant to state policy.

Prof. Sadat emphasized a crucial legal principle: crimes against humanity carry no statute of limitations. As a result, identified perpetrators can be prosecuted in national courts worldwide under universal jurisdiction or other jurisdictional mechanisms regardless of how much time has elapsed. She argued that present-day atrocities—including torture, enforced disappearances, gender and political persecution, extrajudicial executions, and the systemic abuse of the death penalty—are directly sustained by decades of total impunity for earlier crimes.


Addressing multilateral diplomacy, Prof. Sadat criticized Tehran’s conduct during negotiations over a new international convention on crimes against humanity, pointing out that Iranian representatives actively sought to weaken legal obligations and narrow universal-jurisdiction provisions. Affirming that international justice remains the only viable path forward, she concluded: “Armed force will not be the remedy.” She called for an independent international accountability mechanism, reinforced fact-finding mandates, and sustained, uncompromising diplomatic pressure.

https://www.maryam-rajavi.com/en/conference-seeking-justice-for-victims-of-the-1988-massacre/

Location: F8MX+6F Whitelaw, KS, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Shah can't save Iran

Image
When authoritarian regimes start to wobble, outside observers often reach instinctively for the single, familiar idea of ‘the alternative’. It is a human reflex, but a dangerous one. In Iran, as the clerical theocracy shows signs of fracture and the country’s crisis deepens, some Western voices have begun to flirt with a thought that feels neat and historically legible: the return of the Shah’s son. That would be a profound mistake. Iran’s tragedy since 1979 has been that an autocracy was replaced by another autocracy. The lesson should be plain: changing the personality at the top is not enough. What matters is the nature of the state and the source of its legitimacy. Iran does not need a restoration. It needs a foundation for a democratic future. It has been argued that Reza Pahlavi could play a unifying role, perhaps as a symbolic constitutional monarch. But this misunderstands both Iran’s recent history and the political psychology of revolutions. The last Shah was not a constituti...
Read more

The power and sovereignty belongs to the Iranian people’s republic

Image
  Mike Pompeo: Iran's democratic opposition is ready to step up and lead. Former US House Speaker Newt Gingrich: The National Council of Resistance of Iran , an anti-Iranian regime group, announced on Saturday a "provisional government to transfer sovereignty" to the Iranian people and establish a Democratic Republic after the United States and Israel launched strikes against the regime. Rudy Giuliani: What Reza Pahlavi is attempting to do—by declaring himself Iran's "transitional leader"—is dangerous and will only destabilize the situation further. Pahlavi has next to no support inside the country, as he is literally the son of the man who was overthrown by the Iranian people after years of brutality, theft and oppressive rule. The Iranian people will not resort back to a tyrannical monarchy after freeing themselves of a tyrannical Islamic regime. This would be a formula for disaster.
Read more

The Only Path Ahead

Image
The situation in Iran has reached an exceptional moment. The clerical regime no longer faces multiple options or divergent paths. It confronts only one trajectory: either downfall through international belligerence and domestic repression, or downfall through retreat. Conversely, the Iranian people also face no range of choices. There is only one path—and one path alone: an organized uprising leading to the overthrow of religious tyranny in Iran . Yes, only one destination lies before us: victory . Only one path stretches ahead: a democratic revolution, the transfer of power to the Iranian people through democratic means, and, ultimately, the establishment of a democratic republic in Iran. https://www.maryam-rajavi.com/en/conference-at-the-european-parliament-europe-cannot-remain-silent-or-passive/
Read more